Alcohol
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 139-146, June 2005

Treated and treatment-naive alcoholics come from different populations

Neurobehavioral Research, Inc., 201 Tamal Vista Boulevard, Corte Madera, CA 94925, USA

Received 3 June 2004; received in revised form 13 September 2004; accepted 19 October 2004.

Accepting Editor: T.R. Jerrells

Abstract 

In most research on alcoholism, convenience samples of individuals who have been in some type of treatment are used. Berkson's fallacy results when the associations found in studies of select samples are incorrectly presumed to apply to all alcoholics (i.e., including untreated alcoholics in the general population). In the current study, we examined whether treated and untreated alcoholics have similar early alcohol use histories by comparing abstinent alcoholics (treated and sober at least 6 months) with treatment-naive alcoholics (active drinkers). We studied 14 pairs of women and 25 pairs of men matched on the age at which they first met criteria for heavy alcohol use (women, 80 drinks per month; men, 100 drinks per month). The timeline follow-back interview method was used to gather retrospective alcohol use information. Alcohol dose and duration of use were subsequently computed for two intervals: (1) time between the person's first drink and date at which the person met criteria for heavy drinking and (2) period between when criteria for heavy drinking were met and current age of the treatment-naive person from each pair. During the period before the matching “heavy drinking” criteria were met, alcohol dose did not differ between groups. In the period after criteria for heavy alcohol use were met, in comparison with treatment-naive alcoholics, the treated alcoholics had higher average and peak alcohol doses. We rejected the hypothesis that the treatment-naive alcoholics and the treated alcoholics have similar alcohol use trajectories over time, with the treatment-naive sample simply being observed earlier in its alcohol use histories. Instead, we concluded that the two groups come from different populations with regard to alcohol use. In fact, the treated alcoholics had alcohol doses more than 50% higher than those of treatment-naive alcoholics in the years just after they began drinking heavily. This finding supports the suggestion that results from studies of alcoholics in treatment or after treatment (i.e., most studies of alcoholics) cannot be generalized to untreated individuals (who make up the majority of alcoholics).

Keywords: Berkson's fallacy, Alcoholism, Treatment, Study design

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0741-8329(05)00227-2

doi:10.1016/j.alcohol.2005.12.002

Refers to article:

  • Treated and treatment-naive alcoholics come from different populations

    George Fein, Bennett Landman
    Alcohol January 2005 (Vol. 35, Issue 1, Pages 19-26)

  • Erratum

    Alcohol June 2005 (Vol. 36, Issue 2, Pages 137-138)

Refers to erratum:

Alcohol
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 139-146, June 2005