Alcohol
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 139-146 , June 2005

Treated and treatment-naive alcoholics come from different populations

Received 3 June 2004 ,Revised 13 September 2004 ,Accepted 19 October 2004.

References 

  1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed.. Washington, DC: Author; 1994;
  2. Bergman H. Brain dysfunction related to alcoholism: some results from the KARTAD project. In:  Parsons OA,  Butters N,  Nathan PE editor. Neuropsychology of Alcoholism: Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment. New York: Guilford Press; 1987;p. 21–45
  3. Berkson J. Limitations of the application of fourfold table analysis to hospital data. Biometrics Bulletin. 1946;2:47–53
  4. Berkson J. The statistical study of association between smoking and lung cancer. Mayo Clin Proc. 1955;30:319–348
  5. Fleiss J. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: Wiley; 1981;
  6. Grant, B. F. (1997). The influence of comorbid major depression and substance use disorders on alcohol and drug treatment: results of a national survey. Paper presented at the National Institute on Drug Abuse Technical Review Meeting on Comorbid Mental and Addictive Disorders: Treatment and HIV-Related Issues, September 27–28, 1994. Available at: http://www.nida.nih.gov/pdf/monographs/monograph172/004-015_Grant.pdf. Proceedings of meeting available: NIDA Res Monogr 172, 1–169; paper on pp. 4–15.
  7. Harwood HJ, Thomson M, Nesmith T. Healthcare Reform and Substance Abuse Treatment: The Cost of Financing Under Alternative Approaches—A Final Report. Fairfax, VA: Lewin-VHI; 1994;
  8. Jacobson R. The contributions of sex and drinking history to CT brain scan changes in alcoholics. Psychol Med. 1986;16:547–559
  9. Mann RE, Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Pavan D. Reliability of a family tree questionnaire for assessing family history of alcohol problems. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1985;15:61–67
  10. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. (1996). Substance Abuse and The American Woman. New York: Author. Available at: http://www.casacolumbia.org/pdshopprov/shop/item.asp?itemid=46.
  11. Parnas J, Teasdale T. A matched-paired comparison of treated versus untreated schizophrenia spectrum cases. A high-risk population study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1987;75:44–50
  12. Pearl R. Cancer and tuberculosis. Am J Hyg (now Am J Epidemiol). 1929;9:97–159
  13. Roberts RS, Spitzer WO, Delmore T, Sackett DL. An empirical demonstration of Berkson's bias. J Chronic Dis. 1978;31:119–128
  14. Skinner HA, Sheu WJ. Reliability of alcohol use indices: the lifetime drinking history and the MAST. J Stud Alcohol. 1982;43:1157–1170
  15. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Self-report issues in alcohol abuse: state of the art and future directions. Behav Assess. 1990;12:77–90
  16. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline follow-back: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In:  Litten RZ,  Allen JP editor. Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biochemical Methods. Totawa, NJ: Humana Press; 1992;p. 41–72
  17. Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Riley DM, Schuller R, Pavan DS, Cancilla A, et al. The reliability of alcohol abusers' self-reports of drinking and life events that occurred in the distant past. J Stud Alcohol. 1988;49:225–232
  18. Stoltenberg SF, Mudd SA, Blow FC, Hill EM. Evaluating measures of family history of alcoholism: density versus dichotomy. Addiction. 1998;93:1511–1520

PII: S0741-8329(05)00227-2

doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2005.12.002

Alcohol
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 139-146 , June 2005